A restaurant without beer or wine

Not looking for a party, just a glass to go with dinner!
ADVERTISEMENT
I've been to restaurant's that have opened without a liquor or beer and wine license, one or two had a bring your own policy. It worked out well enough, but if you weren't familiar with the place you'd certainly be a bit disappointed when you were offered pop, iced tea and tap water!

We don't drink at home, and rarely buy beer, wine or especially hard liquor, it is more enjoyable to have these when going out to eat.

I guess it is tough to get a license, and it probably costs much, as well as taking out a liability policy.




Permalink
tags: restaurant, dining, beer, wine
posted on Mon, May 19, 2008 07:27 AM
CommentsRSS Feed
Want to leave a comment? Log In to your account
Three cheers... by2ndMonkey1 month ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
...or maybe not!!!

Could you imagine if you chose a place without libations for a "celebration" and you were to toast with an iced tea!

I know they do that often at "AA" meetings, but the majority are responsible with imbibing.
Why? bycwrite1 month ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
does everyone assume everybody drinks alcohol.
It's nice we have a few restaurants without a
liquor license.
Beer & Wine byRob1 month ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
At least now it's much easier and less expensive for a restaurant to get a beer & wine license. Most diners are content with beer & wine offerings. When we first moved here, there was no such license; it was either a full (also rare and expensive) liquor license or nothing. Of course, there was only a tiny fraction of restaurants then, and the only fine dining in town in the 80s was the Topper (now Sante Fe Red's), and it wasn't all that great.