Taxes - a little blurb about them!

The next time you hear a politician use the

word "billion" in a casual manner, think about

whether you want the "politicians" spending

YOUR tax money.



A billion is a difficult number to comprehend,

but one advertising agency did a good job of

putting that figure into some perspective in

one of its releases..


A. A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

B. A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

C. A billion hours ago our ancestors were

living in the Stone Age.

D. A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth.

E. A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and

20 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.

While this thought is still fresh in our brain, let's take a look at New Orleans It's amazing what you can learn with some simple division . .

Louisiana Senator, Mary Landrieu (D), is presently asking the Congress for $250 BILLION to rebuild New Orleans . Interesting number, what does it mean?

A. Well, if you are one of 484,674 residents of

New Orleans (every man, woman, child), you

each get $516,528.

B. Or, if you have one of the 188,251 homes in

New Orleans , your home gets $1,329,787.

C. Or, if you are a family of four, your family

gets $2,066,012.

Washington , D.C .. HELLO!!! ... Are all your calculators broken??


Tax his land,
Tax his wage,
Tax his bed in which he lays.
Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes is the rule.
Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirts,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he tries to think.

Tax his booze,
Tax his beers,
If he cries,
Tax his tears.

Tax his bills,
Tax his gas,
Tax his notes,
Tax his cash.

Tax him good and let him know
That after taxes, he has no dough.

If he hollers,
Tax him more,
Tax hi m until he's good and sore.

Tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in which he lays.
Put these words upon his tomb,
"Taxes drove me to my doom!"

And when he's gone,
We won't relax,
We'll still be after the inheritance TAX!!

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL License Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Perm it Tax
Gasoline Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax),
IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax),
Liquor Tax,
Luxury Tax,
Marriage License Tax,
Medicare Tax,
Property Tax,
Real Estate Tax,
Service charge taxes,
Social Security Tax,
Road Usage Tax (Truckers),
Sales Taxes,
Recreational Vehicle Tax,
School Tax,
State Income Tax,
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA),
Telephone Federal Excise Tax,
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fe e Tax,
Telephone Federal, State and Local Su rcharge Tax,
Telephone Minimum Usage Su rcharge Tax,
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax,
Telephone State and Local Tax,
Telephone Usage Charge Tax,
Utility Tax,
Vehicle License Registration Tax,
Vehicle Sales Tax,
Watercraft Registration Tax,
Well Permit Tax,
Workers Compensation Tax.



FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago,
and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.


What the heck happened?


Permalink
tags: Taxes
posted on Sun, May 11, 2008 08:16 AM
CommentsRSS Feed
Want to leave a comment? Log In to your account
Iraq war vs. New Orleans bydanie0062 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
If taxes seem high, consider how much is being spent on the unjustified, wasteful war in Iraq. The tax buck starts and stop right there. That should make everyone angry.

$250 billion to rehab New Orleans is a deal...and a better way to spend tax dollars in the US. The statements in this post make it sound like money would be handed directly to the residents. That's a totally absurd and false notion - If you take a moment to review Landreau's bill, the money would be used to repair/improve infrastructure and to provide low interest loans for folks affected by the disaster.
RE: Iraq war vs. New Orleans byBozemaniteNo314232 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
Ich bin doch nicht Krosus!
RE: Iraq war vs. New Orleans bydwainegf2 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
http://www.bercasio.com/movies/dems-wmd-before-iraq.wmv
Before we get too carried away with the blame game, Please watch this little blurb about the war in Iraq.
Excellent post BozemaniteNo31423! bygixa2 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
We are being taxed to death, and I really hope voters will think twice about how much more they want to pay when they choose which candidate to vote for this November.

I also feel compelled to add that according to the website for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities about $590 billion — or 22% — of the budget goes to defense spending, and of that "roughly $125 billion went to support operations in Iraq and Afghanistan". Senator Landrieu is requesting twice that much for New Orleans. There are many questions about whether it makes sense to rebuild an area that is below sea level, and about the misappropriation of much of the funding that has already gone to help New Orleans.

BTW, 21% of the budget goes to Social Security and another 21% goes to Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP. I encourage everyone to check out the site. It's pretty interesting.

http://www.cbpp.org/4-14-08tax.htm
Taxes bydanie0062 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
I think we are approaching the trillion dollar mark for the total amount spent on "the war on terror" since 2003. $125 billion is the base budget. Keep in mind that there will be several congressional requests throughout the year for additional funding, just like every year.

The folks in Louisiana lost their homes and livelihood. Do they not deserve assistance? What if something along the same lines happened here and people ffrom the south decided that it wasn't worth the effort to give us assistance for some reason like Montana is "too sparsely populated", or "there's no significant industry here to revive"? How would you feel? It is a shame how New Orleans has been ignored.

BozemaniteNo31423 - Great quote! I haven't seen that one since college political science class. We all have to pay taxes, even though we have folks who operate like King Kroesus in our government. I don't necessarily like paying taxes either and I hate that a lot of it is wasted. However, I'd rather have it spent/wasted in the US rather than on an unjustified war.
RE: Taxes bygixa2 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse)
RE: “What if something along the same lines happened here and people ffrom the south decided that it wasn't worth the effort to give us assistance for some reason like Montana is ‘too sparsely populated’, or ‘there's no significant industry here to revive’? How would you feel?”

Who said anything about Montana? This hypothetical scenario has nothing to do with the discussion about what actually is happening in New Orleans, and I’m not falling for it.

Of course I believe New Orleans deserves assistance, and it has already received substantial aid. It has not “been ignored”.

I’m no expert on New Orleans but I have read a bit about it and I was able to uncover the following with very little effort. According to the White House fact sheet titled The Federal Government is Fulfilling its Commitment to Help the People of the Gulf Coast Rebuild, as of 2007, the Federal Government has already spent $127 billion (including tax relief) on New Orleans and the Gulf region since Hurricane Katrina. That comes to $425,000 per person based on the 300,000 people living in New Orleans. (Bear in mind, the entire GDP of the state of Louisiana is $141 billion. The $250 billion that Senator Landrieu is requesting amounts to an additional $833,333. per person in New Orleans!) Highlights from the report include:

“The Administration Has Provided A Total Of $16.7 Billion In Federal Funds As Part Of The Largest Housing Recovery Program In U.S. History. Of these funds, provided under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) program, more than $10.4 billion has been allocated for Louisiana, of which the State has expended $3.7 billion”, and “Today, The New Orleans Area Has The Best Flood Protection In History, And Work Continues On Improvements. All damages to pre-Katrina infrastructure have been repaired, and in many places, the system is now better than before Hurricane Katrina struck”.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/08/20070829-1.html

The big question is: Where did the rest of the money go? By the way, this is only Federal money and not the additional relief donated by individual citizens, groups, and privately funded charities.

My question about whether it makes sense to rebuild an area that is below sea level referred to the devastated Lower 9th Ward, where only about half of the residents have returned to date. Apparently, many have chosen to resettle elsewhere. (Maybe they can read the writing on the wall.) This area lies 7-10 feet below sea level and was built upon a cypress swamp that was drained and cleared in order to extend the city.

Further, in an op-ed piece for the Washington Post dated 6 September 2005, Klaus Jacob wrote, “Katrina is not even the worst-case scenario. Had the eye of the storm made landfall just west of the city (instead of to the east, as it did) the wind speeds and its associated coastal storm surge would have been higher in New Orleans (and lower in Gulfport, Miss.). The city would have flooded faster, and the loss of life would have been greater.”

Jacob also stated that, due to specific scientific conditions, “Government officials and academic experts have said for years that in about 100 years, New Orleans may no longer exist. Period.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/05/AR2005090501034.html

In no way did I suggest an either/or policy of diverting assistance from New Orleans to the WOT. I simply proposed a realistic assessment and accounting of the billions of Federal relief dollars already allocated to New Orleans before sending more. I don’t want the government to merely throw more money at the problem — I want to see that the money is being spent wisely, on real solutions.
Point taken bydanie0062 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Gixa - I accept your point and you provide totally valid commentary. However, I'd like to apply your last paragraph to my point about the wasted money on the war in Iraq:

"I simply propose a realistic assessment and accounting on the billions of Federal [defense] dollars already allocated to [the war in Iraq] before sending more. I don't want the government to merely throw more money at the problem - I want to see that the money is being spent wisely, on real solutions."

...Hey, what do you know - it works for my argument too!
SS Tax byPooterman2 months ago (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Anyone else have a problem with Seniors being taxed on their Social Security checks? After all, wasn't that money grabbed through taxation to begin with? So the Government is taxing the tax.